Electoral Systems and Public Spending
Gian Maria Milesi-Ferretti (),
Roberto Perotti and
Massimo Rostagno ()
The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2002, vol. 117, issue 2, 609-657
Abstract:
We study the effects of electoral institutions on the size and composition of public expenditure in OECD and Latin American countries. We emphasize the distinction between purchases of goods and services, which are easier to target geographically, and transfers, which are easier to target across social groups. We present a theoretical model in which voters anticipating government policymaking under different electoral systems have an incentive to elect representatives more prone to transfer (public good) spending in proportional (majoritarian) systems. The model also predicts higher total primary spending in proportional (majoritarian) systems when the share of transfer spending is high (low). After defining rigorous measures of proportionality to be used in the empirical investigation, we find considerable support for our predictions.
Date: 2002
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (364)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1162/003355302753650346 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: Electoral System and Public Spending (2001) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:117:y:2002:i:2:p:609-657.
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
The Quarterly Journal of Economics is currently edited by Robert J. Barro, Lawrence F. Katz, Nathan Nunn, Andrei Shleifer and Stefanie Stantcheva
More articles in The Quarterly Journal of Economics from President and Fellows of Harvard College
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().