Wealth Accumulation and the Propensity to Plan
John Ameriks,
Andrew Caplin and
John Leahy
The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2003, vol. 118, issue 3, 1007-1047
Abstract:
Why do similar households end up with very different levels of wealth? We show that differences in the attitudes and skills with which they approach financial planning are a significant factor. We use new and unique survey data to assess these differences and to measure each household's "propensity to plan." We show that those with a higher such propensity spend more time developing financial plans, and that this shift in planning is associated with increased wealth. These findings are consistent with broad psychological evidence concerning the beneficial impacts of planning on goal pursuit. Those with a high propensity to plan may be better able to control their spending, and thereby achieve their goal of wealth accumulation. We find direct evidence supporting this effortful self-control channel in the very strong relationship we uncover between the propensity to plan and budgeting behavior.
Date: 2003
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (280)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1162/00335530360698487 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: Wealth Accumulation and the Propensity to Plan (2002) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:118:y:2003:i:3:p:1007-1047.
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
The Quarterly Journal of Economics is currently edited by Robert J. Barro, Lawrence F. Katz, Nathan Nunn, Andrei Shleifer and Stefanie Stantcheva
More articles in The Quarterly Journal of Economics from President and Fellows of Harvard College
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().