EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Competition and Innovation: an Inverted-U Relationship

Philippe Aghion, Nicholas Bloom (), Richard Blundell (), Rachel Griffith () and Peter Howitt ()

The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2005, vol. 120, issue 2, 701-728

Abstract: This paper investigates the relationship between product market competition and innovation. We find strong evidence of an inverted-U relationship using panel data. We develop a model where competition discourages laggard firms from innovating but encourages neck-and-neck firms to innovate. Together with the effect of competition on the equilibrium industry structure, these generate an inverted-U. Two additional predictions of the model—that the average technological distance between leaders and followers increases with competition, and that the inverted-U is steeper when industries are more neck-and-neck—are both supported by the data.

Date: 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (855) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/qje/120.2.701 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship (2005) Downloads
Working Paper: Competition and innovation: an inverted U relationship (2002) Downloads
Working Paper: Competition and Innovation: An Inverted U Relationship (2002) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:120:y:2005:i:2:p:701-728.

Access Statistics for this article

The Quarterly Journal of Economics is currently edited by Robert J. Barro, Elhanan Helpman, Lawrence F. Katz and Andrei Schleifer

More articles in The Quarterly Journal of Economics from Oxford University Press
Series data maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2017-10-23
Handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:120:y:2005:i:2:p:701-728.