Do Ads Influence Editors? Advertising and Bias in the Financial Media

Jonathan Reuter and Eric Zitzewitz

The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2006, vol. 121, issue 1, 197-227

Abstract: The independence of editorial content from advertisers' influence is a cornerstone of journalistic ethics. We test whether this independence is observed in practice. We find that mutual fund recommendations are correlated with past advertising in three personal finance publications but not in two national newspapers. Our tests control for numerous fund characteristics, total advertising expenditures, and past mentions. While positive mentions significantly increase fund inflows, they do not successfully predict returns. Future returns are similar for the funds we predict would have been mentioned in the absence of bias, suggesting that the cost of advertising bias to readers is small.

Date: 2006
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (141)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/qje/121.1.197 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Do Ads Influence Editors? Advertising and Bias in the Financial Media (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:121:y:2006:i:1:p:197-227.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

The Quarterly Journal of Economics is currently edited by Robert J. Barro, Lawrence F. Katz, Nathan Nunn, Andrei Shleifer and Stefanie Stantcheva

More articles in The Quarterly Journal of Economics from President and Fellows of Harvard College
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().