EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Leveraging Lotteries for School Value-Added: Testing and Estimation

Joshua Angrist (), Peter Hull (), Parag Pathak and Christopher Walters

The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2017, vol. 132, issue 2, 871-919

Abstract: Conventional value-added models (VAMs) compare average test scores across schools after regression-adjusting for students’ demographic characteristics and previous scores. This article tests for VAM bias using a procedure that asks whether VAM estimates accurately predict the achievement consequences of random assignment to specific schools. Test results from admissions lotteries in Boston suggest conventional VAM estimates are biased, a finding that motivates the development of a hierarchical model describing the joint distribution of school value-added, bias, and lottery compliance. We use this model to assess the substantive importance of bias in conventional VAM estimates and to construct hybrid value-added estimates that optimally combine ordinary least squares and lottery-based estimates of VAM parameters. The hybrid estimation strategy provides a general recipe for combining nonexperimental and quasi-experimental estimates. While still biased, hybrid school value-added estimates have lower mean squared error than conventional VAM estimates. Simulations calibrated to the Boston data show that, bias notwithstanding, policy decisions based on conventional VAMs that control for lagged achievement are likely to generate substantial achievement gains. Hybrid estimates that incorporate lotteries yield further gains.

JEL-codes: C52 I20 J24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (49) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/qje/qjx001 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Leveraging Lotteries for School Value-Added: Testing and Estimation (2015) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:132:y:2017:i:2:p:871-919.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.oup.co.uk/journals

Access Statistics for this article

The Quarterly Journal of Economics is currently edited by Robert J. Barro, Lawrence F. Katz, Nathan Nunn, Andrei Shleifer and Stefanie Stantcheva

More articles in The Quarterly Journal of Economics from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2022-09-07
Handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:132:y:2017:i:2:p:871-919.