EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Benefits of Forced Experimentation: Striking Evidence from the London Underground Network

Shaun Larcom, Ferdinand Rauch and Tim Willems

The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2017, vol. 132, issue 4, 2019-2055

Abstract: We present evidence that a significant fraction of commuters on the London Underground do not travel on their optimal route. We show that a strike on the Underground, which forced many commuters to experiment with new routes, brought lasting changes in behavior. This effect is stronger for commuters who live in areas where the Underground map is more distorted, which points to the importance of informational imperfections. Information resulting from the strike improved network efficiency. Search costs alone are unlikely to explain the suboptimal behavior.

JEL-codes: D83 L91 R41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (47)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/qje/qjx020 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: The Benefits of Forced Experimentation: Striking Evidence from the London Underground Network (2015) Downloads
Working Paper: The Benefits of Forced Experimentation: Striking Evidence from the London Underground Network (2015) Downloads
Working Paper: The benefits of forced experimentation: strikingevidence from the London Underground network (2015) Downloads
Working Paper: The Benefits of Forced Experimentation: Striking Evidence from the London Underground Network (2015) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:132:y:2017:i:4:p:2019-2055.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

The Quarterly Journal of Economics is currently edited by Robert J. Barro, Lawrence F. Katz, Nathan Nunn, Andrei Shleifer and Stefanie Stantcheva

More articles in The Quarterly Journal of Economics from President and Fellows of Harvard College
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:132:y:2017:i:4:p:2019-2055.