The Tariff Act of 1922

F. W. Taussig

The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1922, vol. 37, issue 1, 1-28

Abstract: The tariff act of 1913 inconclusive as an experiment, 2. — Two factors important in 1922: war feeling, and demand for protection from the agricultural states, 3. — History of legislation, 6. — Concessions to the agricultural element, in duties and in the free list, 7. — Wool and sugar, 9. — Some extraordinarily high duties on manufactures, 11. — Dyestuffs, 14. — Administrative provisions and American valuation, 17. — The President's discretionary powers, 19. — How serviceable did the Tariff Commission prove? 22. — General administrative provisions, 24. — Conclusion, 26.

Date: 1922
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1885907 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:37:y:1922:i:1:p:1-28.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

The Quarterly Journal of Economics is currently edited by Robert J. Barro, Lawrence F. Katz, Nathan Nunn, Andrei Shleifer and Stefanie Stantcheva

More articles in The Quarterly Journal of Economics from President and Fellows of Harvard College
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().