Regional Differences in Rates and Rateable Values in England and Wales, 1921–1936

Michael Daly

The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1940, vol. 54, issue 4_Part_1, 624-654

Abstract: Purpose and scope of the study; reasons for excluding Scottish data, 624. — The four composite areas, 627.— The averages used, 628.— Conclusions apparent when data are graphed, 628.— Implications of these characteristics, 634.— The significance of underassessment, 636.— Revaluation in 1929 left much to be done, 638.— Organization employed, 641.— Distribution of government grants, 642.— Revaluation in 1934 brought some improvement, 646. — Derating of industrial properties, 648.— Opposition to derating, 651.— seq="a" General conclusions concerning the significance of underassessment, 653.

Date: 1940
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/qje/54.4_Part_1.624 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:54:y:1940:i:4_part_1:p:624-654.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

The Quarterly Journal of Economics is currently edited by Robert J. Barro, Lawrence F. Katz, Nathan Nunn, Andrei Shleifer and Stefanie Stantcheva

More articles in The Quarterly Journal of Economics from President and Fellows of Harvard College
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().