The Decline of Dominant Firms, 1905–1929

Richard E. Caves, Michael Fortunato and Pankaj Ghemawat

The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1984, vol. 99, issue 3, 523-546

Abstract: The theory of dynamic limit pricing implies that a firm maximizes its wealth by gradually sacrificing its dominant market share. We extend the theory by simulation methods to show that higher structural entry barriers generally result in both higher profits and a slower sacrifice of market share. The model is applied to 42 once-dominant firms in U. S. manufacturing to explain jointly the declines of their market shares and the profit rates earned during 1905–1929. The statistical results agree substantially with the hypothesis that these firms behaved consistently with maximizing their wealth through dynamic limit pricing.

Date: 1984
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1885963 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:99:y:1984:i:3:p:523-546.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

The Quarterly Journal of Economics is currently edited by Robert J. Barro, Lawrence F. Katz, Nathan Nunn, Andrei Shleifer and Stefanie Stantcheva

More articles in The Quarterly Journal of Economics from President and Fellows of Harvard College
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().