Volatility Markets Underreacted to the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Ing-Haw Cheng and Jeffrey Pontiff

The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, vol. 10, issue 4, 635-668

Abstract: VIX futures prices rose slowly in late February and early March 2020 as the COVID-19 pandemic took hold. Futures price premiums, defined as futures prices minus real-time statistical forecasts of future VIX values, turned sharply negative and remained negative until mid-April. Trading strategies based on estimated premiums profited from the subsequent increase in market volatility and equity market crash. The underreaction of futures prices to growing pandemic risks poses a puzzle for standard asset pricing models.Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.

JEL-codes: G11 G13 G40 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rapstu/raaa010 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:rasset:v:10:y::i:4:p:635-668.

Access Statistics for this article

The Review of Asset Pricing Studies is currently edited by Zhiguo He

More articles in The Review of Asset Pricing Studies from Society for Financial Studies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().