What’s Good for Women Is Good for Science: Evidence from the American Finance Association

Renee Adams and Michelle Lowry ()

The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 2022, vol. 11, issue 3, 554-604

Abstract: Motivated by evidence that the largest gender differences in career outcomes arise within occupations, we examine a single occupation. With the support of the American Finance Association (AFA), we surveyed AFA members on the professional culture within finance. Individual experiences vary substantially, especially across men and women. Contrary to conventional narratives, differences in preferences play little role in explaining why women experience worse outcomes. Bias and discrimination have the largest effect. The consequences of noninclusiveness extend beyond the personal to the entire field. Our findings suggest that institutions potentially could do more than they recognize to improve both diversity and science. (JEL I23, J16, J24, J44, J71)

Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rcfs/cfac013 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:rcorpf:v:11:y:2022:i:3:p:554-604.

Access Statistics for this article

The Review of Corporate Finance Studies is currently edited by Andrew Ellul

More articles in The Review of Corporate Finance Studies from Society for Financial Studies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().