Agency Costs and Strategic Speculation in the U.S. Stock Market

Paolo Pasquariello

The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 2024, vol. 13, issue 1, 147-190

Abstract: This study investigates the notion that agency-driven information asymmetry may affect a firm’s stock liquidity. I postulate that less uncertainty about managerial agency problems may enhance liquidity provision by lowering dealers’ perceived adverse selection risk from trading with better-informed speculators. Consistent with my conjecture, I find that the staggered adoption of antitakeover provisions across U.S. states in the 1980s and 1990s — a plausibly exogenous shock unambiguously reducing the threat of (and speculators’ information advantage about) value-enhancing intervention — robustly improves the stock liquidity of affected firms relative to peer firms, especially at prior high fundamental or agency uncertainty and with poor governance. (JEL D22, G14, G34)Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.

Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rcfs/cfac009 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:rcorpf:v:13:y:2024:i:1:p:147-190.

Access Statistics for this article

The Review of Corporate Finance Studies is currently edited by Andrew Ellul

More articles in The Review of Corporate Finance Studies from Society for Financial Studies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().