Why Operational Risk Modelling Creates Inverse Incentives

René Doff

Journal of Financial Regulation, 2015, vol. 1, issue 2, 284-289

Abstract: Operational risk modelling has become commonplace in large international banks and is gaining popularity in the insurance industry as well. This is partly due to financial regulation (Basel II, Solvency II). This article argues that operational risk modelling is fundamentally flawed, despite efforts to resolve the scarce data in the tail of the probability distributions. Potential solutions are special statistical techniques or shared (external) data initiatives. While capital regulation might be one perspective, internal capital modelling efforts are also flawed because of the main principles of the RAROC methodology. Rather than handling the issue of data scarcity, institutions and regulators should better focus on operational risk management and avoid large losses. Capital regulation for operational risk should be further simplified.

Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jfr/fjv005 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:refreg:v:1:y:2015:i:2:p:284-289.

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Financial Regulation is currently edited by Dan Awrey, Geneviève Helleringer and Wolf-Georg Ringe

More articles in Journal of Financial Regulation from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().