Integrated Assessment Models and the Social Cost of Carbon: A Review and Assessment of U.S. Experience

Gilbert Metcalf and James H. Stock

Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2017, vol. 11, issue 1, 80-99

Abstract: This article considers the role of integrated assessment models (IAMs) in estimating the social cost of carbon (SCC) for U.S. regulatory purposes. Our perspective is rooted in the needs of U.S. institutions responsible for designing and implementing climate policy, specifically regulatory agencies within the executive branch and Congress should it choose to take up climate legislation. We argue that policymakers need a numerical value for the SCC for policy evaluation and implementation and that producing a credible numerical value requires sophisticated computer models that incorporate climate and economic considerations, that is, IAMs. We also argue that whatever the true value of the SCC, it is not zero, although there is considerable uncertainty surrounding the current state of scientific knowledge about the costs of climate change. We conclude that the evolving nature of the science and the ultimate goal of informing first-best policy suggests that the official SCC used for regulatory analysis by the U.S. government should not be thought of as a single number or even a range of numbers; rather it should be thought of more broadly as a process that yields updated estimates of those numbers and ranges. The ultimate goal of the process is scientific credibility, public acceptance, and political and legal viability.

JEL-codes: Q54 Q58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (22)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reep/rew014 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:renvpo:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:80-99.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Environmental Economics and Policy is currently edited by Robert Stavins

More articles in Review of Environmental Economics and Policy from Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().