Using the Conservation Reserve to Reduce Program Crop Plantings

Steven J. Taff

Review of Agricultural Economics, 1990, vol. 12, issue 1, 89-97

Abstract: This paper examines the policy instrument by which a land retirement program designed primarily for conservation purposes attempts to reduce surplus commodity production as well. A simple model incorporating the cropland allocation effects of entry into the federal Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) is developed to estimate the reduction in aggregate crop acreage brought about under two program alternatives: (1) the "base bite," which requires a reduction in a farm's commodity base as a condition of CRP entry (the current law) and (2) no base bite, which for planting reduction purposes would rely upon a "displacement" of acreage actually available for planting. Data from the first eight rounds of CRP bidding (through February 1989) show that the base bite reduces CRP entrants' aggregate annual program crop plantings by 14.9 million acres under 1987 program rules, while displacement would have reduced plantings by 13.1 million acres. Under "1990 rules" (no set-aside required for participation), the base bite provision would reduce plantings by 19.6 million acres. Displacement is unaffected by set-aside levels. If the base bite were removed, the concomitant lower opportunity costs of entry would result in either an increase in CRP acreage or a decrease in budget outlays, depending upon program administration.

Date: 1990
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/aepp/12.1.89 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:revage:v:12:y:1990:i:1:p:89-97.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Review of Agricultural Economics from Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ) and Christopher F. Baum ().