Weed Control Decision Rules under Uncertainty
William Deen,
Alfons Weersink,
Calum Turvey and
Susan Weaver
Review of Agricultural Economics, 1993, vol. 15, issue 1, 39-50
Abstract:
A model of weed control, which took into account the stochastic nature of crop price, yield, and weed density, was developed to assist farmers in determining weed densities that justify herbicide application and the optimal rate of application. In an application of cocklebur control in soybeans, it was found that the value of following the "if-then-else" treatment strategy versus a fixed application rate regardless of weed density was approximately $25 per acre at low weed numbers. Profits of the marginal treatment strategy are higher than the "if-then-else" strategy, but may not be sufficient to cover the additional informational costs. Under both strategies, the total amount of herbicide applied decreases with increases in uncertainty under the assumption of risk neutrality. The result is due to the convex relationship between weed density and yield loss. Under the assumption of maximizing expected utility, there are instances in which herbicide use increases with risk aversion as per conventional wisdom.
Date: 1993
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1349710 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:revage:v:15:y:1993:i:1:p:39-50.
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Review of Agricultural Economics from Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ) and Christopher F. Baum ().