A Comparison of Fiscal Consequences for Tax and Expenditure Limitation Proposals

Mark A. Edelman

Review of Agricultural Economics, 1999, vol. 21, issue 1, 177-188

Abstract: Three constitutional tax and expenditure limitation proposals are analyzed for historical consequences. The first and second allowed 32% less state spending and $710 million less in local government aid compared to actual. The first proposal also imposed limits on local government units and allowed property taxes to increase about 5% more than actual. The second proposal covered state revenues only and would have required a 29.7% increase in property taxes to fully replace the reduction in local government aid. A third proposal excluded local government aid but effectively covered only half of the state general fund revenues.

Date: 1999
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1349979 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:revage:v:21:y:1999:i:1:p:177-188.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Review of Agricultural Economics from Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ) and Christopher F. Baum ().