Agricultural Research: Benefits and Beneficiaries of Alternative Funding Mechanisms
Wallace Huffman and
Richard Just
Review of Agricultural Economics, 1999, vol. 21, issue 1, 2-18
Abstract:
This article analyzes alternative funding mechanisms for agricultural research and the benefits and beneficiaries of these approaches. Although other mechanisms exist, the discussion focuses on public formula and competitive grants programs, private-sector contracts and grants, and revenue from sale of intellectual property rights (IPRs) or new products embodying innovations. Over the past two decades, agricultural research has been criticized for the noncompetitive nature of research fund allocations. Considerable evidence exists that the system has performed well for society. We conclude that the private sector should be permitted to carry out research that it finds profitable to undertake with minimal competition from the public sector. The public research institutions should focus on general and pretechnology science programs that complement private research-and-development (R&D) activities and conduct applied research in areas in which innovations are socially beneficial but not privately profitable. The mechanism for channeling public funds to researchers (e.g., formula, competitive grants, or earmarks) can be expected to affect the types of benefits/impacts of agricultural research conducted and the efficiency of the research activity. Issues remain about the emphasis on process versus substance in the R&D funding debate. However, available evidence does not suggest the elimination of traditional funding mechanisms for public agricultural research.
Date: 1999
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (17)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1349968 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: Agricultural Research: Benefits and Beneficiaries of Alternative Funding Mechanisms (1999)
Working Paper: Agricultural Research: Benefits and Beneficiaries of Alternative Funding Mechanisms (1999) 
Working Paper: Agricultural Research: Benefits and Beneficiaries of Alternative Funding Mechanism (1997) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:revage:v:21:y:1999:i:1:p:2-18.
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Review of Agricultural Economics from Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ) and Christopher F. Baum ().