Unbiasedness and Market Efficiency Tests of the U.S. Rice Futures Market
Andrew M. McKenzie,
Bingrong Jiang,
Harjanto Djunaidi,
Linwood Hoffman and
Eric J. Wailes
Review of Agricultural Economics, 2002, vol. 24, issue 2, 474-493
Abstract:
This study examines short-run and long-run unbiasedness within the U.S. rice futures market. Standard OLS, cointegration, and error-correction models are used to determine unbiasedness. In addition, the forecasting performance of the rice futures market is analyzed and compared to out-of-sample forecasts derived from an additive ARIMA model and the error-correction model. The results of our unbiasedness tests and the forecasting performance of the rice futures market provide supporting evidence that the U.S. long-grain rough rice futures market is efficient. The results have important price risk management and price discovery implications for Arkansas and U.S. rice industry participants. Copyright 2002, Oxford University Press.
Date: 2002
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1467-9353.00032 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Journal Article: Unbiasedness and Market Efficiency Tests of the U.S. Rice Futures Market (2002) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:revage:v:24:y:2002:i:2:p:474-493
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Review of Agricultural Economics from Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ) and Christopher F. Baum ().