EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Analysis of Beef Producers' Risk Management Perceptions and Desire for Further Risk Management Education

David C. Hall, Thomas O. Knight, Keith Coble, Alan E. Baquet and George F. Patrick

Review of Agricultural Economics, 2003, vol. 25, issue 2, 430-448

Abstract: Beef cattle producers were surveyed in Texas and Nebraska to investigate perceptions of sources of risk, the effectiveness of risk management strategies, and interest in further risk management education, particularly production risk, using probit analysis. Important decision variables identified are age, prior use of risk management tools, previous attendances of risk management education, and risk aversion. Severe drought and cattle price variability are identified as primary risk factors with potential to affect farm income. Extremely cold weather and disease are of less importance. Understocking pasture and storing hay are perceived most effective as risk management options.

Date: 2003
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (31)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1467-9353.00148 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Journal Article: Analysis of Beef Producers' Risk Management Perceptions and Desire for Further Risk Management Education (2003) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:revage:v:25:y:2003:i:2:p:430-448.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Review of Agricultural Economics from Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ) and Christopher F. Baum ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:25:y:2003:i:2:p:430-448.