Alternative Demand for University Outreach Services from Georgia's Golf Industry

Cesar Escalante (), Wojciech J. Florkowski, Gil W. Landry and Pierre I. Boumtje

Review of Agricultural Economics, 2004, vol. 26, issue 1, 118-131

Abstract: Recent technological advancements have influenced farmers' growing demand for private information suppliers, a service traditionally monopolized by public outreach programs of land grant educational institutions. This waning appeal for university extension services creates pressure for these institutions to explore other market segments to broaden their audience coverage. This study demonstrates a potential market niche in Georgia's golf industry for university outreach services. Binomial logistic regression results indicate that significant demand (a) is negatively influenced by golf facility size; (b) is directly related to the level of industry experience of the golf superintendents; and (c) could come from facilities that require assistance in growth-, pest-, and employment-related concerns. Copyright 2004, Oxford University Press.

Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1467-9353.2003.00165.x (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Journal Article: Alternative Demand for University Outreach Services from Georgia's Golf Industry (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:revage:v:26:y:2004:i:1:p:118-131

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Review of Agricultural Economics from Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ) and Christopher F. Baum ().