EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Interactive peer review as a productive evaluation process

M A T de Silva, Geethika Yapa and E Dilip de Silva

Research Evaluation, 2002, vol. 11, issue 3, 119-128

Abstract: Difficulties of research evaluation in a small country — Sri Lanka — with a limited pool of scientific expertise has led to peer review process innovations, where an interactive process has emerged. Three differently managed research grant schemes using this are described. The effectiveness of these evaluation techniques depend on the extent to which researchers are involved with reviewers in the process, and on the context in which the research objectives are defined. Outstanding success has been achieved when both conditions were satisfied in a research programme. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Date: 2002
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154402781776817 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:rseval:v:11:y:2002:i:3:p:119-128

Access Statistics for this article

Research Evaluation is currently edited by Julia Melkers, Emanuela Reale and Thed van Leeuwen

More articles in Research Evaluation from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:11:y:2002:i:3:p:119-128