Peer review for the evaluation of academic research: lessons from the Italian experience
Anna Barbara and
Research Evaluation, 2007, vol. 16, issue 3, 216-228
The aim of the paper is to control the reliability of peer review when evaluating academic research in the Three-Year Research Assessment Exercise developed in Italy. Our analysis covers four disciplinary sectors: chemistry, biology, humanities and economics. The results provide evidence that highlights strengths and weaknesses of peer review for judging the quality of the academic research in different fields of science, vis-à-vis bibliometric indicators. Moreover, some basic features of the evaluation process are discussed, to understand their usefulness for reinforcing the effectiveness of the peers' final outcome. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (17) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:rseval:v:16:y:2007:i:3:p:216-228
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Research Evaluation from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press () and Christopher F. Baum ().