A cautionary view of co-citation analysis

Diana Hicks

Research Evaluation, 1991, vol. 1, issue 1, 31-36

Abstract: Co-citation analysis requires frurther development and problems remain with current maps. With the help of seven basic questions it is hoped to allow a more critical examination of these maps and to bridge the gap between the true believers and the radical critics. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Date: 1991
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rev/1.1.31 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:rseval:v:1:y:1991:i:1:p:31-36

Access Statistics for this article

Research Evaluation is currently edited by Julia Melkers, Emanuela Reale and Thed van Leeuwen

More articles in Research Evaluation from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().