Perceptions and actions: relationships of views on risk with citation actions of nanotechnology scientists
Jan Youtie,
Stephen Carley,
Philip Shapira,
Elizabeth A Corley and
Dietram A Scheufele
Research Evaluation, 2011, vol. 20, issue 5, 377-388
Abstract:
This study links survey data on scientists' societal perceptions of nanotechnology with publication data to understand the extent of association between societal perspectives held by nanoscientists and publication actions. Specifically, we explore the relationship between scientists' attitudes in two areas and their actions in citing nanotechnology environmental, health, and safety (EHS) publications. This relationship is examined by linking responses from participants in the University of Wisconsin's Nanotechnology and Society Survey of nanoscientists with publication data from the Georgia Tech global nanotechnology database. The likelihood of citing EHS publications is estimated as a function of the two societal perception variables as well as the scientific field and background characteristics such as PhD completion year, tenure-track position, gender, and religiosity. We find that perceptions about moral limits mediate citation actions whereas attitudes toward government regulation have no significant effect. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/095820211X13176484436014 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:rseval:v:20:y:2011:i:5:p:377-388
Access Statistics for this article
Research Evaluation is currently edited by Julia Melkers, Emanuela Reale and Thed van Leeuwen
More articles in Research Evaluation from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().