The relevance of knowledge transfer for universities’ efficiency scores: an empirical approximation on the Spanish public higher education system
Eva M. de la Torre,
Tommaso Agasisti () and
Carmen Perez-Esparrells
Research Evaluation, 2017, vol. 26, issue 3, 211-229
Abstract:
This article examines how knowledge transfer (KT) indicators affect analyses on efficiency in the Higher Education sector, taking into account the characteristics of the Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). After revising the concept of third mission as a field for data development and its importance in assessing university performance, we applied various data envelopment analysis models with different specifications to 47 Spanish public universities to test whether KT indicators are relevant when evaluating the performance of HEIs in terms of their efficiency and, if so, which indicators are most suitable. Our results suggest that the effect of including KT indicators in the efficiency analyses varies from university to university according to their characteristics. The subject mix taught at the university, the focus according to each mission’s relative importance within the total range of activities carried out in each university (mission mix), and the mix of their third mission activities affect the increase of the universities’ efficiency scores when KT is taken into account in the analysis. This means that these factors affect the universities’ position for the different efficiency scores.
Keywords: universities’; efficiency; data envelopment analysis; third mission; knowledge transfer; Spanish higher education. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reseval/rvx022 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:rseval:v:26:y:2017:i:3:p:211-229.
Access Statistics for this article
Research Evaluation is currently edited by Julia Melkers, Emanuela Reale and Thed van Leeuwen
More articles in Research Evaluation from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().