Valuation regimes in academia: Researchers’ attitudes towards their diversity of activities and academic performance
Nicolas Robinson-Garcia,
Rodrigo Costas,
Gabriela F and
Thed N van
Research Evaluation, 2023, vol. 32, issue 2, 496-514
Abstract:
Evaluation systems have been long criticized for abusing and misusing bibliometric indicators. This has created a culture by which academics are constantly exposing their daily work to the standards they are expected to perform. In this study, we investigate whether researchers’ own values and expectations are in line with the expectations of the evaluation system. We conduct a multiple case study of five departments in two Dutch universities to examine how they balance between their own valuation regimes and the evaluation schemes. For this, we combine curriculum analysis with a series of semi-structured interviews. We propose a model to study the diversity of academic activities and apply it to the multiple case study to understand how such diversity is shaped by discipline and career stage. We conclude that the observed misalignment is not only resulting from an abuse of metrics but also by a lack of tools to evaluate performance in a contextualized and adaptable way.
Keywords: evaluation culture; research evaluation; scientometrics; research careers; academia (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reseval/rvac049 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:rseval:v:32:y:2023:i:2:p:496-514.
Access Statistics for this article
Research Evaluation is currently edited by Julia Melkers, Emanuela Reale and Thed van Leeuwen
More articles in Research Evaluation from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().