Partial and particularistic: grant peer review panels evaluating interdisciplinarity

Kristin Oxley

Research Evaluation, 2025, vol. 34

Abstract: There are indications that the degree of interdisciplinarity in grant proposals correlates negatively with funding success. However, insight into how this competitive disadvantage is produced is limited. This study provides an exploratory analysis of the challenges interdisciplinary research proposals face in review processes, building on extensive observations of grant review panels and interviews with panellists in a wide variety of funding organizations. Results suggest that individual assessments are partial, with a tendency towards cognitive particularism. The organizational framework and panel interaction potentially perpetuate and even reinforce these individual tendencies. The implications of these findings for review process design and their potential to explain the contrasting results in extant research on cognitive particularism are examined.

Keywords: peer review; grant review; grant panels; research funding (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reseval/rvaf037 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:rseval:v:34:y:2025:i::p:rvaf037.

Access Statistics for this article

Research Evaluation is currently edited by Julia Melkers, Emanuela Reale and Thed van Leeuwen

More articles in Research Evaluation from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().