Replicability and the humanities: the problem with universal measures of research quality

Chloe Patton

Research Evaluation, 2025, vol. 34

Abstract: Responding to claims that replication studies represent epistemic progress in the humanities, this article outlines how empirical research in the humanities renders universal metascientific measures of research quality problematic at best. It uses Samuel Huntington’s often-replicated Clash of Civilizations as a case study to introduce key onto-epistemic issues at stake, highlighting the incompatibility of non-positivist humanities research paradigms with replicability. It then considers two recent efforts to replicate a seminal humanities text from the field of religion and science, arguing that while these studies make useful findings, they do not translate to epistemic progress in the humanities more generally. In doing so, this paper serves not only as a rejoinder to STEM-centric conceptions of research quality, but also a defence of transformative humanities research in the context of widespread attacks on humanities scholarship.

Keywords: replication; research quality; humanities; post qualitative; ontology; epistemology (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reseval/rvaf052 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:rseval:v:34:y:2025:i::p:rvaf052.

Access Statistics for this article

Research Evaluation is currently edited by Julia Melkers, Emanuela Reale and Thed van Leeuwen

More articles in Research Evaluation from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().