UGC-CARE delisted: consequences and concerns for Indian research ecosystem

Mohanam Menaka, Naina Mohamed and Rajadurai Vijay Solomon

Research Evaluation, 2026, vol. 35

Abstract: The UGC-CARE List, introduced in June 2019, was a significant step toward enhancing research quality in India by regulating the standards of academic publications. However, the recent announcement of its withdrawal has sparked diverse opinions and concerns across the research community. This opinion piece presents reflections gathered from a survey of 200 researchers across India on the dissolution of the UGC-CARE List and its potential impact on the nation’s research landscape. Respondents expressed the chance of return of predatory publishing practices, fragmentation in journal standards, and diminished credibility of Indian research. While acknowledging existing limitations within the UGC-CARE system, such as limited disciplinary representation and inconsistencies in journal listings, the majority emphasized the need for centralized quality checks and expert oversight. This piece outlines the key factors that could affect publication output in the absence of UGC-CARE List and recommends crucial measures to uphold research integrity, including rigorous training and transparent evaluation mechanisms to be followed by the scrutinizing committee at institutional level.

Keywords: UGC-CARE list; predatory publications; cloned/hijacked journals; Indian research (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reseval/rvaf059 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:rseval:v:35:y:2026:i::p:rvaf059.

Access Statistics for this article

Research Evaluation is currently edited by Julia Melkers, Emanuela Reale and Thed van Leeuwen

More articles in Research Evaluation from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().