When everyone writes like a pro: rethinking grant review in the age of AI

Chris H Hugenholtz

Research Evaluation, 2026, vol. 35

Abstract: Writing quality is no longer a reliable indicator of merit in grant review. AI tools make polished proposals common, forcing reviewers to focus on substance, feasibility, and verifiable evidence of applicants’ ideas. Well-designed systems can recognize genuine ideas rather than just carefully crafted applications.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; grant applications; peer-review; writing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reseval/rvag005 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:rseval:v:35:y:2026:i::p:rvag005.

Access Statistics for this article

Research Evaluation is currently edited by Julia Melkers, Emanuela Reale and Thed van Leeuwen

More articles in Research Evaluation from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().