Evaluating high risk research: an assessment of the Wellcome Trust's Sir Henry Wellcome Commemorative Awards for Innovative Research

Jonathan Grant and Liz Allen

Research Evaluation, 1999, vol. 8, issue 3, 201-204

Abstract: In 1996, the Wellcome Trust set up an annual competition to fund high-risk, non-obvious research in the biomedical sciences, called Showcase awards. The evaluation at the end of the first year involved an experiment to assess how innovative the Showcase awards were perceived to be, in comparison with a sample of standard project grants. Expert panel members were asked to assess how ‘risky’, ‘novel’, ‘speculative’, ‘adventurous’ and ‘innovative’ each of five Showcase and five project grants were. The results showed that Showcase is fulfilling its objective of supporting high risk research and also that it is possible to apply novel techniques to evaluate unusual schemes. By applying epidemiological methods, in the form of a masked randomised trial, as much systematic error was eliminated as possible, thus making the result more robust. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Date: 1999
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154499781777513 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:rseval:v:8:y:1999:i:3:p:201-204

Access Statistics for this article

Research Evaluation is currently edited by Julia Melkers, Emanuela Reale and Thed van Leeuwen

More articles in Research Evaluation from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().