Does familiarity breed concern? Bench scientists and the Human Genome Mapping Project

Peter Glasner and Harry Rothman

Science and Public Policy, 1999, vol. 26, issue 4, 233-240

Abstract: A survey of 1000 users of the UK Human Genome Project (HGP) Resource Centre in Cambridge, UK found that many respondents concerned with mapping and sequencing genetic material felt strongly that attempts to patent the results of the HGP would impede the future development of diagnostics and therapeutics, and that current attempts to commercialise the results were premature. Contrary to the views of some senior scientists, the majority felt that the HGP posed new ethical issues for society. This paper suggests some explanations for these apparent discrepancies of view, in the context of research into the public understanding of science. It focuses on the various social worlds of those close to the laboratory bench in contrast to those more instrumental in influencing S&T policy. The current turn towards recognising the complexity of both scientific and lay views concerning the new genetic technologies is welcome. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Date: 1999
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154399781782383 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:scippl:v:26:y:1999:i:4:p:233-240

Access Statistics for this article

Science and Public Policy is currently edited by Nicoletta Corrocher, Jeong-Dong Lee, Mireille Matt and Nicholas Vonortas

More articles in Science and Public Policy from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().