Breeding familiarity: Environmental risk assessment for genetically engineered crops in Canada

Katherine Barrett and Elisabeth Abergel

Science and Public Policy, 2000, vol. 27, issue 1, 2-12

Abstract: As of 1995, genetically engineered (GE) crops had been planted on over three million hectares in Canada. To assess the environmental impacts of these crops, the Canadian federal government employs the principles of familiarity and substantial equivalence. These principles aim to define the ‘novelty’ of GE crops relative to non-engineered varieties, and thereby function as triggers for broader risk assessment. Here, we outline the history of familiarity and substantial equivalence, and analyse their current role in Canadian regulations. We conclude that, in practice, these principles support decisions to de-regulate GE crops by promoting biotechnology as an innovative and competitive technology, while simultaneously downplaying concerns for environmental hazards. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Date: 2000
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154300781782138 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:scippl:v:27:y:2000:i:1:p:2-12

Access Statistics for this article

Science and Public Policy is currently edited by Nicoletta Corrocher, Jeong-Dong Lee, Mireille Matt and Nicholas Vonortas

More articles in Science and Public Policy from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().