Science advice in the knowledge economy

Jerry Ravetz

Science and Public Policy, 2001, vol. 28, issue 5, 389-393

Abstract: The frequently remarked public distrust of ‘science’ is focused on science advice. On its present scale, such advice is a new sort of practice, for which the scientific community is not well prepared. The contributions of science advisors are deployed by those in the policy process, who have quite different agendas. Advice is more required now because of the knowledge economy, with the deep involvement of the State, and also the inevitability of ‘unintended consequences’. It also fosters a sophisticated public, who subject both advice and advisors to critical scrutiny. The welcome reforms in science advice have a variety of possible functions, and, without clarity about them and about the structural features of the problem, there is a danger that they will be frustrated. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Date: 2001
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154301781781354 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:scippl:v:28:y:2001:i:5:p:389-393

Access Statistics for this article

Science and Public Policy is currently edited by Nicoletta Corrocher, Jeong-Dong Lee, Mireille Matt and Nicholas Vonortas

More articles in Science and Public Policy from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().