Social science political counseling: The good, the bad and the enticed

Frans A J Birrer

Science and Public Policy, 2001, vol. 28, issue 6, 438-440

Abstract: A major task for Renn's “social science political counseling” is to address non-ideal behavior by actors, who are often entangled in systems of subliminal enticement. Procedural checks and balances are crucial, as is ethos. How experts combine inputs from various contexts requires special attention, particularly to how expert claims are validated. We should not simply assume one common rationality, but use this framework of subliminal enticement to look for a better understanding of the reasons and circumstances that make viewpoints differ. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Date: 2001
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154301781781282 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:scippl:v:28:y:2001:i:6:p:438-440

Access Statistics for this article

Science and Public Policy is currently edited by Nicoletta Corrocher, Jeong-Dong Lee, Mireille Matt and Nicholas Vonortas

More articles in Science and Public Policy from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().