EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The technological trajectories of the agrochemical industry: Change and continuity

Pierre-Benoit Joly and Stéphane Lemarié

Science and Public Policy, 2002, vol. 29, issue 4, 259-266

Abstract: This article analyses recent technological change in the agrochemical industry. Using the concept of technological trajectories developed by evolutionary economists, it examines the coherence between the different characteristics of the research process and its environment in this sector. A distinction is made between the plant protection trajectory which has prevailed until now and the current emergence of a crop protection trajectory. For the time being it is only possible to consider two extreme forms of crop protection strategy, the first based on a ‘product package’, the second on ‘integrated pest management’ (IPM). The implications of these two forms of crop protection strategy, in terms of demand, appropriability and their cognitive frame, are discussed in detail. This leads to some sceptical conclusions concerning the incentives to, and the capabilities of, current pesticide leaders to develop innovations for IPM. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Date: 2002
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154302781780921 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:scippl:v:29:y:2002:i:4:p:259-266

Access Statistics for this article

Science and Public Policy is currently edited by Nicoletta Corrocher, Jeong-Dong Lee, Mireille Matt and Nicholas Vonortas

More articles in Science and Public Policy from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:29:y:2002:i:4:p:259-266