EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

'Don't make nanotechnology sexy, ensure its benefits, and be neutral': Studying the logics of new intermediary institutions in ambiguous governance contexts

Heidrun Åm

Science and Public Policy, 2013, vol. 40, issue 4, 466-478

Abstract: This paper suggests a new theoretical approach to studying intermediary institutions, particularly intermediary institutions at the science--policy nexus. Intermediary institutions that mediate between science and politics have often been approached from the perspective of 'boundary organizations'. But this model, incorporating assumptions of principal--agent theory, is not suitable for capturing case studies (of intermediary institutions) in ambiguous governance contexts. Indeed, there is a lack of systemic studies of the material implications that the rise of new governance actors has, for example for governing emerging technologies. Therefore, we need a new theoretical vocabulary to grasp how intermediary institutions emerge and how they work in practice. This paper addresses this gap by analysing the shortcomings of a nanotechnology observatory project. Drawing on both actor network theory and political discourse theory, the paper outlines a three-fold framework based on the concept of logics that shifts the focus of research toward an analysis of context-based case studies of intermediaries. Copyright The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com, Oxford University Press.

Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/sct054 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:scippl:v:40:y:2013:i:4:p:466-478

Access Statistics for this article

Science and Public Policy is currently edited by Nicoletta Corrocher, Jeong-Dong Lee, Mireille Matt and Nicholas Vonortas

More articles in Science and Public Policy from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:40:y:2013:i:4:p:466-478