Herding in policy responses to coronavirus disease 2019
Jianfeng Guo,
Xuemei Zhang,
Fu Gu,
Jiannan Zhu,
Chao Deng,
Xinze Zhao and
Xiaohan Yang
Science and Public Policy, 2023, vol. 50, issue 5, 893-904
Abstract:
Governments have proposed various policy responses to contain the spread of coronavirus disease 2019, but there is little available knowledge about how these policies are formulated. Here we quantify the herding effect in the pandemic containment policies issued by governments of different regions during the period of 18 January 2020 to 29 May 2020, using a modified Lakonishok–Shleifer–Vishny approach. The results show that all the policies exhibit some degree of herding, and the policy herding in the USA is significantly stronger than that of China but weaker than that of the rest of the world. Specifically, the overall herding intensity in the policy responses of the Northern China is greater than that of the Southern China. We believe that policy herding is linked with risk aversion, which is triggered by perceived uncertainty associated with significant risk events. This work highlights the significance of resource sufficiency and preparedness.
Keywords: COVID-19; herding effect; risk aversion; Lakonishok–Shleifer–Vishny model; perceived uncertainty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scad033 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:scippl:v:50:y:2023:i:5:p:893-904.
Access Statistics for this article
Science and Public Policy is currently edited by Nicoletta Corrocher, Jeong-Dong Lee, Mireille Matt and Nicholas Vonortas
More articles in Science and Public Policy from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().