Bridging conflicting frames in policies for digital transformation
Nunzia Coco,
Cinzia Colapinto and
Vladi Finotto
Science and Public Policy, 2024, vol. 51, issue 2, 236-246
Abstract:
Despite several policies aimed at igniting digital transformation, many regions lag behind. We investigate this discrepancy by postulating that the political consensus on accelerating Industry 4.0 adoption among micro-, small- and mid-sized enterprises (MSMEs) needs to consider the heterogeneity of entrepreneurial and social fabrics. Best practices in policy-making exist, but their deployment requires adaptations. The present paper delves into such adaptations and on the mechanics behind how a ‘model’ is modified locally. We do so by illustrating the results of action research on a regional policy initiative. Our findings point to one important set of factors and mechanisms conducive to the adaptation of a policy model to the peculiarities of a locale via the alignment of different cognitive frames: co-design processes. We elaborate on the role of different actors, the relevance of ‘hybrid’ actors, and the nature of universities as platforms
Keywords: digital transformation; policy-driven innovation; collaborative approaches; governance tensions; action research; framing literature (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scad068 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:scippl:v:51:y:2024:i:2:p:236a-246.
Access Statistics for this article
Science and Public Policy is currently edited by Nicoletta Corrocher, Jeong-Dong Lee, Mireille Matt and Nicholas Vonortas
More articles in Science and Public Policy from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().