Regulation of online gambling

Ingo Fiedler

Economics and Business Letters, 2018, vol. 7, issue 4, 162-168

Abstract: In most jurisdictions gambling is considered a demerit good that causes negative externalities and requires market interventions. Such interventions are based on (1) consumer protection and public health, (2) crime prevention and public order, and (3) fiscal motives. Despite a relative homogeneity among Western cultures in normative values, a broad variety of regulatory systems for online gambling can be observed, ranging from free markets to licensing systems, state monopolies and prohibitions—even within the same nation state. It is hypothesized that these differences stem from insufficient knowledge of the idiosyncrasies of online gambling rather than from different regulatory goals. A comparative study is thus needed to explore the socioeconomic effects of different regulatory regimes and to educate regulators.

Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://reunido.uniovi.es/index.php/EBL/article/view/12921 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ove:journl:aid:12921

Access Statistics for this article

Economics and Business Letters is currently edited by Francisco J. Delgado

More articles in Economics and Business Letters from Oviedo University Press Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Francisco J. Delgado ().