Returns in trading versus non-trading hours: The difference is day and night
Michael Kelly and
Steven P Clark
Journal of Asset Management, 2011, vol. 12, issue 2, No 5, 132-145
Abstract:
Abstract Market efficiency implies that the risk-adjusted returns from holding stocks during regular trading hours should be indistinguishable from the risk-adjusted returns from holding stocks outside those hours. We find evidence to the contrary. We use broad-based index exchange-traded funds for our analysis and the Sharpe ratio to compare returns. The magnitude of this effect is startling. For example, the geometric average close-to-open (CO) risk premium (return minus the risk-free rate) of the QQQQ from 1999–2006 was +23.7 per cent whereas the average open-to-close risk premium was −23.3 per cent with lower volatility for the CO risk premium. This result has broad implications for when investors should buy and sell broadly diversified portfolios.
Keywords: anomaly; efficiency; ETF; Sharpe ratio (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (32)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/jam.2011.2 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:assmgt:v:12:y:2011:i:2:d:10.1057_jam.2011.2
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/finance/journal/41260
DOI: 10.1057/jam.2011.2
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Asset Management is currently edited by Marielle de Jong and Dan diBartolomeo
More articles in Journal of Asset Management from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().