 Disentangling rebalancing returnJournal of Asset Management, 2014, vol. 15, issue 5, No 3, 316 pages Abstract: Abstract The use of portfolio rebalancing as a profitable strategy (or ‘volatility harvesting’) is a hot topic. Indeed, it is interesting to know what the impact of periodic rebalancing is on the growth rate of a portfolio. Unfortunately, the terminology used in the literature is confusing. Terms such as ‘diversification return’ and ‘rebalancing return’ are used interchangeably to indicate the growth rate that a rebalanced portfolio can earn in excess of a buy-and-hold portfolio. The literature is also confused in specifying this excess growth rate from rebalancing. In this article, we investigate the full return from rebalancing and decompose it into the volatility return and the dispersion discount. We prove some general results regarding these components and present some simple approximations that provide direct insight into the driving forces behind these building blocks. We consider a pro forma US asset portfolio over the period 1974–2013, which allows us to investigate the relative magnitude of the discussed effects and their time variation. Keywords: portfolio rebalancing; buy-and-hold portfolio; volatility harvesting; diversification return (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:assmgt:v:15:y:2014:i:5:d:10.1057_jam.2014.29 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from DOI: 10.1057/jam.2014.29 Access Statistics for this article Journal of Asset Management is currently edited by Marielle de Jong and Dan diBartolomeo More articles in Journal of Asset Management from Palgrave Macmillan |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.