On the information content of going concern opinions: The effects of SAS numbers 58 and 59
Mark Schaub () and
Michael Highfield
Additional contact information
Mark Schaub: Northwestern State University, College of Business
Michael Highfield: Assistant Professor of Finance at Louisiana Tech University
Journal of Asset Management, 2003, vol. 4, issue 1, No 4, 22-31
Abstract:
Abstract The information content of audit opinions has been scrutinised in the past. Research and discussions attempted to ascertain whether audit opinions contain useful information for financial statement users and whether accountants are qualified to make accurate assessments about a firm's viability as a going concern. Statements on Auditing Standards (SAS) 58 and 59 eliminated the ‘subject to’ audit opinion because of doubts whether such opinions contained useful information. Instead, a ‘subject to’ qualified opinion is communicated as ‘special language’ included in unqualified audit opinions. Evidence is provided that the audit opinion name change in 1988, which did away with the ‘subject to’ qualified designation of going concern opinions (GCOs), was merely cosmetic and did not affect the information content of those opinions when the GCOs with ‘special language’ are announced in the financial media.
Keywords: going concern opinions; information transfers; audit opinion information content (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/palgrave.jam.2240093 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:assmgt:v:4:y:2003:i:1:d:10.1057_palgrave.jam.2240093
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/finance/journal/41260
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jam.2240093
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Asset Management is currently edited by Marielle de Jong and Dan diBartolomeo
More articles in Journal of Asset Management from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().