EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Risk-Aversion Concepts in Expected- and Non-Expected-Utility Models

Michèle Cohen

The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, 1995, vol. 20, issue 1, 73-91

Abstract: The non-expected-utility theories of decision under risk have favored the appearance of new notions of increasing risk like monotone increasing risk (based on the notion of comonotonic random variables) or new notions of risk aversion like aversion to monotone increasing risk, in better agreement with these new theories. After a survey of all the possible notions of increasing risk and of risk aversion and their intrinsic definitions, we show that contrary to expected-utility theory where all the notions of risk aversion have the same characterization ( u concave), in the framework of rank-dependent expected utility (one of the most well known of the non-expectedutility models), the characterizations of all these notions of risk aversion are different. Moreover, we show that, even in the expected-utility framework, the new notion of monotone increasing risk can give better answers to some problems of comparative statics such as in portfolio choice or in partial insurance. This new notion also can suggest more intuitive approaches to inequalities measurement. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory (1995) 20, 73–91. doi:10.1007/BF01098959

Date: 1995
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (23)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/grir/journal/v20/n1/pdf/grir199564a.pdf Link to full text PDF (application/pdf)
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/grir/journal/v20/n1/full/grir199564a.html Link to full text HTML (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:genrir:v:20:y:1995:i:1:p:73-91

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10713

Access Statistics for this article

The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review is currently edited by Michael Hoy and Nicolas Treich

More articles in The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review from Palgrave Macmillan, International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:pal:genrir:v:20:y:1995:i:1:p:73-91