Optimal Dynamic Hedging in Incomplete Futures Markets
Abraham Lioui (),
Pascal Nguyen and
Patrice Poncet
Additional contact information
Patrice Poncet: University of Paris-I Sorbonne and ESSEC, Avenue Bernard Hirsch, B.P. 105, 95021, Cergy-Pontoise Cedex, France
The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, 1996, vol. 21, issue 1, 103-122
Abstract:
This article derives optimal hedging demands for futures contracts from an investor who cannot freely trade his portfolio of primitive assets in the context of either a CARA or a logarithmic utility function. Existing futures contracts are not numerous enough to complete the market. In addition, in the case of CARA, the nonnegativity constraint on wealth is binding, and the optimal hedging demands are not identical to those that would be derived if the constraint were ignored. Fictitiously completing the market, we can characterize the optimal hedging demands for futures contracts. Closed-form solutions exist in the logarithmic case but not in the CARA case, since then a put (insurance) written on his wealth is implicitly bought by the investor. Although solutions are formally similar to those that obtain under complete markets, incompleteness leads in fact to second-best optima. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory (1996) 21, 103–122. doi:10.1007/BF00949052
Date: 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/grir/journal/v21/n1/pdf/grir199680a.pdf Link to full text PDF (application/pdf)
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/grir/journal/v21/n1/full/grir199680a.html Link to full text HTML (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:genrir:v:21:y:1996:i:1:p:103-122
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10713
Access Statistics for this article
The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review is currently edited by Michael Hoy and Nicolas Treich
More articles in The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review from Palgrave Macmillan, International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().