Public Versus Private Insurance with Dual Theory: A Political Economy Argument
Jean Hindriks
The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, 2001, vol. 26, issue 3, 225-241
Abstract:
This paper analyzes the political support for public insurance in the presence of a private insurance alternative. The public insurance is compulsory and offers a uniform insurance policy. The private insurance is voluntary and can offer different insurance policies. Adopting Yaari's [Econometrica, 55, 95–115, 1987] dual theory to expected utility (i.e., risk aversion without diminishing marginal utility of income), we show that adverse selection on the private insurance market may lead a majority of individuals to prefer public insurance over private insurance, even if the median risk is below the average risk (so that the median actually subsidizes high-risk individuals). We also show that risk aversion makes public insurance more attractive and that the dual theory is less favourable to a mixed insurance system than the expected utility framework. Lastly, we demonstrate how the use of genetic tests may threaten the political viability of public insurance. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory (2001) 26, 225–241. doi:10.1023/A:1015289903491
Date: 2001
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/grir/journal/v26/n3/pdf/grir2002140a.pdf Link to full text PDF (application/pdf)
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/grir/journal/v26/n3/full/grir2002140a.html Link to full text HTML (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: Public versus private insurance with dual theory: a political economy argument (2001)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:genrir:v:26:y:2001:i:3:p:225-241
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10713
Access Statistics for this article
The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review is currently edited by Michael Hoy and Nicolas Treich
More articles in The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review from Palgrave Macmillan, International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().