Portfolio Selection with Quadratic Utility Revisited
Timothy Mathews ()
The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, 2004, vol. 29, issue 2, 137-144
Abstract:
Considering a simple portfolio selection problem by agents with quadratic utility, an apparently counterintuitive outcome results. When such a choice is over two assets that can be ordered in terms of riskiness, an agent that is more risk averse may optimally invest a larger portion of wealth in the riskier asset. It is shown that such an outcome is not counterintuitive, since for the portfolios from which agents optimally choose, a larger proportion of investment in the riskier asset leads to a less risky portfolio. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory (2004) 29, 137–144. doi:10.1023/B:GEPA.0000046566.50332.5b
Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/grir/journal/v29/n2/pdf/grir2004167a.pdf Link to full text PDF (application/pdf)
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/grir/journal/v29/n2/full/grir2004167a.html Link to full text HTML (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Journal Article: Portfolio Selection with Quadratic Utility Revisited (2004) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:genrir:v:29:y:2004:i:2:p:137-144
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10713
Access Statistics for this article
The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review is currently edited by Michael Hoy and Nicolas Treich
More articles in The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review from Palgrave Macmillan, International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().