Insurance wage-offer disparities by gender: random forest regression and quantile regression evidence from the 2010–2018 American Community Surveys
Richard J. Butler () and
Gene Lai ()
Additional contact information
Richard J. Butler: Brigham Young University
Gene Lai: University of North Carolina
The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, 2023, vol. 48, issue 2, No 2, 192-229
Abstract:
Abstract This paper examines differences in the wage-offer functions between males and females in the insurance industry. The results of random forest regression (RFR) residual analysis and quantile regressions (QRs) by gender indicate considerable inequities for underwriters, sales agents, and claims adjusters. We find relatively modest wage inequities among actuaries. Underwriters’ and adjusters’ gender wage inequality lies between the actuaries and sales agents. Across the specifications (RFR, QR, and the OLS benchmark), males benefit more from experience than females except for actuaries. In addition, males generally have a greater return to education than females (except for actuaries). Sales agents’ jobs exhibit the greatest inequality, with extremely high values for the regression Gini index of inequality at the upper quantiles. Actuaries exhibit the least amount of gender inequality across the board, with demographic responses suggesting competitive pressures across states yielding the least wage-offer inequality across gender. In summary, taste-based discrimination, social employment networks, difficulties in assessing productivity in heterogeneous work situations, competitiveness in the labor market, and the flexibility of work hours help explain our findings for different occupations in the insurance industry.
Keywords: Insurance wage-offer inequities by gender; Regression Gini index; Random forest regression residual analysis; Quantile regression; Underwriters; Actuaries; Insurance sales agents; Claims adjusters (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s10713-022-00078-7 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:genrir:v:48:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1057_s10713-022-00078-7
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10713
DOI: 10.1057/s10713-022-00078-7
Access Statistics for this article
The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review is currently edited by Michael Hoy and Nicolas Treich
More articles in The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review from Palgrave Macmillan, International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().