Do Life Insurers' Asset Allocation Strategies Influence Performance within the Enterprise Risk Framework&quest

Etti G Baranoff and Thomas W Sager
Additional contact information
Etti G Baranoff: School of Business, Virginia Commonwealth University, Snead Hall, 301 West Main Street, Richmond, VA 23284-4000, U.S.A
Thomas W Sager: Department of Information, Risk, and Operations Management, The University of Texas at Austin, CBA 5.202, Austin, TX 78712-1175, U.S.A.

The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, 2009, vol. 34, issue 2, 242-259

Abstract: In this paper we examine the impact of asset allocation strategies on the investment performance of life insurers in the U.S. We are especially interested in comparing the effects of active portfolio management to the effects of passive holding strategies. We define three novel quantitative indices of static/dynamic strategies to represent important dimensions of the active/passive spectrum of investment strategies. The indices are computed from portfolio allocations reported in the firms’ annual statement data. Using cluster analysis, we partition the population of life insurers into three groups, characterised by generally having static (passive), dynamic (active) and mixed asset allocation strategies, respectively. There are major differences among the three clusters in terms of risk profile, size and other factors. We model investment performance and allocations among the major holdings of bonds, stocks, cash and mortgages explicitly as simultaneously interacting phenomena. In order to isolate the effect of allocation strategies from the confounding effects of other risks, we imbed a spectrum of enterprise risks, treated as exogenous or predetermined, within the model framework of endogenously interacting performance and asset allocation variables. The strategy indicators are also exogenous variables. We find that the most active cluster enjoys the greatest relative performance, even controlling for allocations among asset classes. The Geneva Papers (2009) 34, 242–259. doi:10.1057/gpp.2009.5

Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/gpp/journal/v34/n2/pdf/gpp20095a.pdf Link to full text PDF (application/pdf)
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/gpp/journal/v34/n2/full/gpp20095a.html Link to full text HTML (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:gpprii:v:34:y:2009:i:2:p:242-259

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/finance/journal/41288/PS2

Access Statistics for this article

The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice is currently edited by Christophe Courbage

More articles in The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice from Palgrave Macmillan, The Geneva Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().